MKET, the infinitely annoying street name ‘ROFLCOPTR’ or, for the chemists, methoxetamine, is the new legal high making waves around York. For me though, not the most experimental soul, the idea of a horse tranquillizer swirling around my blood stream has never appealed.
Yet I like to consider myself fairly liberal on drug matters. I’m not adverse to measures promoting cannabis for medical use and with MKET, so I approached the issue with my usual naivety – if it’s legal, why is abusing it any worse than the standard York student’s downing of cheap Willow Sambuca shots, or an office worker’s eight daily cups of coffee?
However, this is exactly the view the distributors of such drugs hope to foster – an ignorant, glamourised perception of what is an exceptionally dangerous and addictive drug. MKET is a few chemical compounds away from MKAT, or mephedrone, a past ‘legal high’ that after a brief craze was banned across the EU at the end of 2010. They both can cause pretty serious hallucinogenic effects for the price of a bottle of vodka. Almost exclusively available online, MKET web distributors have tripled in the last six months.
My basic understanding of human biology tells me snorting or swallowing a chemical labelled “not fit for human consumption”, does not sound like it’s going to produce the best effects, despite the quick high. The experience of students interviewed in York has almost been exclusively negative, and some of worst side effects include horrific teeth grinding, nausea, heart palpitations and, yes, even a risk of death. One or more of these side effects have been felt by over half those who take legal highs according to a UK Addiction survey.
Whilst I haven’t tried MKET, I don’t intend to, I recognise all of us will probably know someone who has or will. Rather slyly, its creator “M.” professed in an interview with hipster site Vice.com that it was an anti-depressant for those with mental or physical scars abandoned by the medical system, an expected lack of moral compass from an underground drug chemist. It is this marketing that worries me most. Often portrayed as a “friendlier” form of ecstasy, or even as a painkiller, such an attribution could not be further from the point.
MKET distributors aim at party-goers and conversely those seeking strong pain relief. Both are guided to purchase with little information about what’s entering their system. A quick Google search yields little but information on how to purchase MKET. Dosage requirements and health warnings are near impossible to find, a particularly worrying absence considering MKET’s inherent potency and heightened risk of overdose.
When something is classified as ‘legal’ it leads to various connotations; safe, principled, protective. None of these phrases can be associated with MKET. Naivety will not suffice, and distributors will keep glamorising this drug until we step up. Whilst we wait with baited breath for reports of the first attributed deaths, I fear the government and those in the know are claiming ignorance of MKET’s obvious human misuses, and not fulfilling their duty of informing people of its inherent dangers and stopping distribution of these ‘legal’ highs once and for all.
I really must proof-read my bitchy comments.
More importantly, Vision really must post my bitchy comments. I look like a plank now.
As a point with the phrase “just a few chemical compounds away” is a relatively meaningless statement, in the sense that can basically describe any two organic compounds, so just adds to the shoddy science that goes into almost all reporting on drugs. Describing them as similar in structure is probably more accurate.
My comment isn’t being posted. It is a point by point rebuttal of this article, riddled as it is with inaccuracies and scaremongering. Since I’ve tried 3 times, here’s a link to it instead. Sorry for the spamming, but I can’t seem to reply any other way.
http://jantacular.tumblr.com/post/17609869257/mket-stupid-article-rebuttal
you’ve missed the point entirely. its sold as ‘not for human consumption’ simply so that it can be sold for human consumption. if they sold it explicitly for humans the authorities would be on them immediately. it is designed specifically for humans. they just said that to get round a loop hole.
re banning all ‘legal’ highs. yeah great idea, alcohol obviously does not fall in to that category because it is 100% and noone ever dies from it.
*100% safe
@Janis: Funny, you mention in your delirious rant that “There are no reports of addiction”, and yet you then reference a website which says: “High instances of significant urge to redose”. Sounds like addiction to me.
I really do have far too much time on my hands.
@V urge to redose =/= addiction. Addiction is dependance. Urge to redose is “oh I’m sober now, I wish I had more. There is a massive difference. Nice try.
MKET has no chemical relation to Mephedrone, it’s related to Ketamine and PCP. The only relation to Mephedrone (also known as MCat) is in marketing and relative success.
The important message here is that methoxetamine is significantly more potent than ketamine and that it’s often being sold as ketamine so people need to be warey of anything they take and if they’re going to take something make sure to try a small dose first to make sure it’s what they are expecting.
Personally, even if I did have any interest in taking these drugs myself I’d steer well clear of Methoxetamine, no one knows if it shares the potential serious neruotoxicity of PCP and it may have serious side effects that may take some time to manifest.